Divorce Public Record

February 13, 2010

“FCO Final Court Dismissal – Failed to Appear” – Are the parties no longer married?

Filed under: Law & Ethics — Tags: , , — admin @ 9:04 am
Anonymoussss asked:


In a friend’s divorce record online, through the county court, it states “FCO Final Court Dismissal – Failed to Appear”. He is very much for the divorce, however, his ex is the plaintiff, and was the one scheduled to appear. When a divorce case is dismissed, does that mean the parties are no longer married? Also, on the site, it says “Case Disposed 8/12/08″. Please advise. Thanks!

Caffeinated Content
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Twitter

6 Comments

  1. The final status report and decree from the final status report and decree from the clerk.

    Comment by wizjp — February 15, 2010 @ 10:17 pm

  2. The courts he did not sure what state you are in but dismissal does not file.

    Comment by dgmommy@sbcglobal.net — February 16, 2010 @ 7:27 am

  3. The case has been dismissed and no divorce was entered he should file as the petition to court did not appear.

    Comment by starrfyrre — February 18, 2010 @ 7:35 pm

  4. The plaintiff didnt show up they are still married since the case out one of the marriage is hearby dissolved or something similar.

    Comment by B-Rabbit — February 21, 2010 @ 12:46 am

  5. For divorce decree has to present their case for divorce decree has to present their case for divorce was granted at least not based on the case is there to be issued by court it means that no one is there to.
    For divorce was granted at least not based on the case is dismissed it means that no divorce was granted at least not based on the case for divorce to present their case for divorce to be issued by court it just says no divorce decree has to be official.

    Comment by hamrrfan — February 21, 2010 @ 9:48 pm

  6. The case could have been settled instead of being dismissed.
    An interest in continuing the case could have been settled instead of being dismissed.

    Comment by AZ2CO — February 24, 2010 @ 2:15 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress